#19 closed defect (fixed)
Non-fatal errors are apparently fatal
Reported by: | David Loeffler | Owned by: | Olly Betts |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | minor | Milestone: | 1.2.7 |
Component: | cavern | Version: | 1.1.16 |
Keywords: | Cc: |
Description
Running cavern on the top-level all.svx
file in the "sample data" tarball produces a bunch of errors about malformatted dates:
david@rockhopper:~/survex/loser> ~/bin/cavern all Survex 1.1.16 Copyright � 1990-2011 Olly Betts In file included from surface/allnr41.svx:22, from surf.svx:26, from all.svx:20: surface/sonnausn.svx:8: Invalid day of the month In file included from surface/allnr41.svx:118, from surf.svx:26, from all.svx:20: surface/228ausn.svx:10: Invalid day of the month In file included from caves/031/031.svx:15, from caves/caves.svx:7, from all.svx:27: caves/031/elchalt.svx:8: Invalid day of the month In file included from caves/040/040arge.svx:7, from caves/040/040.svx:21, from caves/caves.svx:9, from all.svx:27: caves/040/arge/elefant.svx:8: Invalid day of the month In file included from caves/040/040arge.svx:19, from caves/040/040.svx:21, from caves/caves.svx:9, from all.svx:27: caves/040/arge/e6.svx:8: Invalid day of the month In file included from caves/040/040arge.svx:25, from caves/040/040.svx:21, from caves/caves.svx:9, from all.svx:27: caves/040/arge/niete.svx:9: Invalid day of the month In file included from caves/041/041.svx:77, from caves/caves.svx:10, from all.svx:27: caves/041/arge/mark.svx:8: Invalid day of the month In file included from caves/041/041.svx:78, from caves/caves.svx:10, from all.svx:27: caves/041/arge/seiteng.svx:8: Invalid day of the month In file included from caves/041/041.svx:87, from caves/caves.svx:10, from all.svx:27: caves/041/arge/bigchamb.svx:8: Invalid day of the month In file included from caves/041/041.svx:92, from caves/caves.svx:10, from all.svx:27: caves/041/arge/germanrt.svx:8: Invalid day of the month In file included from caves/041/041.svx:93, from caves/caves.svx:10, from all.svx:27: caves/041/arge/e41b.svx:8: Invalid day of the month In file included from caves/041/041.svx:95, from caves/caves.svx:10, from all.svx:27: caves/041/arge/steinsch.svx:8: Invalid day of the month In file included from caves/041/041.svx:96, from caves/caves.svx:10, from all.svx:27: caves/041/arge/megalo.svx:8: Invalid day of the month In file included from caves/041/041.svx:97, from caves/caves.svx:10, from all.svx:27: caves/041/arge/wdr.svx:8: Invalid day of the month In file included from caves/041/041.svx:98, from caves/caves.svx:10, from all.svx:27: caves/041/arge/lampntot.svx:8: Invalid day of the month In file included from caves/041/041.svx:101, from caves/caves.svx:10, from all.svx:27: caves/041/arge/glueck.svx:8: Invalid day of the month In file included from caves/041/041.svx:103, from caves/caves.svx:10, from all.svx:27: caves/041/arge/din.svx:8: Invalid day of the month In file included from caves/041/041.svx:106, from caves/caves.svx:10, from all.svx:27: caves/041/arge/edelmean.svx:8: Invalid month In file included from caves/041/041.svx:107, from caves/caves.svx:10, from all.svx:27: caves/041/arge/rondos.svx:8: Invalid month In file included from caves/041/041.svx:111, from caves/caves.svx:10, from all.svx:27: caves/041/arge/alice.svx:8: Invalid day of the month In file included from caves/078/078.svx:90, from caves/caves.svx:11, from all.svx:27: caves/078/fetzig.svx:8: Invalid day of the month In file included from caves/078/078.svx:92, from caves/caves.svx:11, from all.svx:27: caves/078/stuttg.svx:8: Invalid day of the month In file included from caves/115/115.svx:23, from caves/caves.svx:15, from all.svx:27: caves/115/nebukad.svx:8: Invalid day of the month In file included from caves/144/144.svx:25, from caves/caves.svx:29, from all.svx:27: caves/144/arge/144ein.svx:9: Invalid day of the month In file included from caves/144/144.svx:26, from caves/caves.svx:29, from all.svx:27: caves/144/arge/144horiz.svx:8: Invalid day of the month Removing trailing traverses... Concatenating traverses between nodes... Simplifying network... Solving 2 simultaneous equations Solving to find x coordinates... Solving 2 simultaneous equations Solving to find x coordinates... Solving one equation Solving to find x coordinates... Solving 101 simultaneous equations Solving to find x coordinates... Solving 7 simultaneous equations Solving to find x coordinates... Solving 28 simultaneous equations Solving to find x coordinates... Solving 58 simultaneous equations Solving to find x coordinates... Solving one equation Solving to find x coordinates... Solving 2 simultaneous equations Solving to find x coordinates... Calculating network... Calculating traverses between nodes... Calculating trailing traverses... Calculating statistics... Survey contains 11442 survey stations, joined by 11492 legs. There are 266 loops. Survey has 216 connected components. Total length of survey legs = 66026.52m (66028.33m adjusted) Total plan length of survey legs = 49308.43m Total vertical length of survey legs = 30114.66m Vertical range = 1085.31m (from sternloch.ent at 1850.00m to 115.115rest.orgasm.1 at 764.69m) North-South range = 4570.79m (from lunge.dreamfudge at 85498.95m to 115.115rest.orgasm.17 at 80928.17m) East-West range = 3321.34m (from raetsel.4 at 38281.23m to 183.lower.1 at 34959.89m) 161 0-nodes. 926 1-nodes. 9194 2-nodes. 1014 3-nodes. 122 4-nodes. 16 5-nodes. 5 6-nodes. 2 7-nodes. 2 8-nodes. CPU time used 0.41s Done. There were 0 warning(s) and 25 non-fatal error(s) - no output files produced.
Although it describes the date errors as "non-fatal", there's no way to make it output anything! It would be nice to have a switch that forced it to output a 3d file anyway; otherwise in what sense are the errors "non-fatal"?
Change History (16)
comment:1 Changed 14 years ago by
Status: | new → assigned |
---|
comment:2 Changed 14 years ago by
I'd still argue in favour of an "--ignore-errors-if-at-all-possible"
command-line option.
comment:3 Changed 14 years ago by
That would work, but it would be nice to have an approach which works well when cavern isn't run from the command line - opening a .svx file in aven is now working pretty well, and I think it's likely to be how the majority of users will process files in the future, but it is clumsy if it has to stop to ask for options to use before processing.
comment:4 Changed 14 years ago by
Milestone: | → 1.1.17 |
---|---|
Version: | → 1.1.16 |
comment:5 Changed 13 years ago by
Milestone: | 1.2.0 → 1.2.1 |
---|
comment:6 Changed 13 years ago by
Milestone: | 1.2.1 → 1.2.2 |
---|
comment:7 Changed 13 years ago by
Milestone: | 1.2.2 → 1.2.3 |
---|
comment:8 Changed 13 years ago by
Milestone: | 1.2.3 → 1.2.4 |
---|
comment:9 Changed 13 years ago by
Milestone: | 1.2.4 → 1.2.5 |
---|
comment:11 Changed 13 years ago by
Milestone: | 1.2.6 → 1.2.7 |
---|
comment:12 Changed 13 years ago by
To allow the option to work for gui users as well as on the command line have a settings file (/etc/survex/options ~/.config/survex/options) in which default options could go. GUI users would access this via a 'settings' menu somewhere where they could tick 'ignore processing errors if possible' which just adds that option to the conf file. We already have something like this for setting default printing options IIRC?
If survex ever gets turned into a proper library then this goes in the API.
A bit fiddly but it should work, and useful beyond just this one case.
comment:13 Changed 13 years ago by
This is really something which "belongs" to the dataset though, rather than to the installation.
If I send you a dataset which works for me because I've set this, then it won't work for you unless you have too. That's clearly unhelpful.
I think the best options are:
- Add a new command (or possibly add a new flag to *flags) which allows this to be controlled. That also would allow a dataset to be converted to have parseable dates gradually rather than only being able to enforce this or not for the whole dataset (or worse for a whole installation). This is also handy if you connect two caves where the dates are good in one but not in the other.
- Make this a warning rather than an error.
comment:14 Changed 12 years ago by
Milestone: | 1.2.7 |
---|
I've made this case a warning in commit ce8f81, so it should be in the next release (1.2.7).
That addresses the immediate issue (so unsetting the milestone), though it would be good to have a scheme for addressing this class of issue where we really want to make cavern fussier for new data when there is existing data we don't want to break. Perhaps "warning" is that scheme, which would be least work. Or we could easily add another class of diagnostic which is sort of between warning and error for use in such cases.
comment:15 Changed 4 months ago by
Milestone: | → 1.2.7 |
---|---|
Resolution: | → fixed |
Status: | assigned → closed |
The issue with *date
in existing data from before we started parsing its argument triggering errors was addressed in 1.2.7 by demoting that error to a warning.
The confusing "non-fatal" vs "fatal" error distinction is no longer made in output (functions like fatalerror()
still exist in the code, but they just report an "error" and then exit. Looks like that was in 1.2.0.
it would be good to have a scheme for addressing this class of issue where we really want to make cavern fussier for new data when there is existing data we don't want to break. Perhaps "warning" is that scheme, which would be least work. Or we could easily add another class of diagnostic which is sort of between warning and error for use in such cases.
Overall I think the extra complication is not justified, and we should just be mindful of not breaking reasonable existing usage when deciding whether a new diagnostic is a warning or an error. In some cases that existing usage is broken and we were just lacking a check, so sometimes a new Survex version may give an error on existing data, but such cases should be very much the exception and when there's a reasonable fallback we should issue a warning and do that. Typically that will probably be doing what existing versions do, as in the case of *date
where if the format is wrong we issue a warning and ignore the *date
command).
Therefor closing.
comment:16 Changed 4 months ago by
A related point - in 1.4.10 unconnected surveys are now a warning rather than an error. If there are other cases which are currently an error but it might be useful to users to continue, please highlight them and we can look into changing them to warnings.
Repeating my reply from the list to keep this together:
I've dropped the "non-fatal" in r3592.
Still pondering what to do about whether this should be a warning instead. Being fussy for users without legacy data seems good overall, so simply relaxing it to a warning isn't great. It could be conditional on
*require 1.1.7
or later (without that it would be a warning, with it an error), but it doesn't seem totally ideal to link the concepts of "I'm using a new feature" and "this data is free of legacy issues".